It Starts With The Egg Diet

With less than two weeks to go until what is set to be a highly consequential midterm ballot, California adults are divided on whether the state is generally headed in the correct management (47%) or wrong direction (48%); a majority of likely voters (54%) call up the state is headed in the incorrect direction (43% correct direction). Similar shares held this view last calendar month (wrong direction: 44% adults, 49% likely voters; right direction: 50% adults, 48% probable voters). Today, there is a broad partisan divide: seven in ten Democrats are optimistic about the direction of the country, while 91 percent of Republicans and 59 percentage of independents are pessimistic. Majorities of residents in the Central Valley and Orange/San Diego say the land is going in the wrong management, while a bulk in the San Francisco Bay Area say right management; adults elsewhere are divided. Across demographic groups, Californians ages 18 to 34 (threescore%), Asian Americans (52%), college graduates (52%), renters (52%), and women (52%) are the only groups in which a majority are optimistic about California’due south direction.

Californians are much more pessimistic most the management of the country than they are nigh the direction of the land. Solid majorities of adults (62%) and likely voters (71%) say the United states of america is going in the incorrect management, and majorities take held this view since September 2021. One in 3 or fewer adults (33%) and likely voters (25%) think the country is going in the correct direction. Majorities across all demographic groups and partisan groups, as well equally across regions, are pessimistic about the direction of the The states.

The state of the economic system and aggrandizement are probable to play a critical role in the upcoming election, and about 4 in 10 adults (39%) and likely voters (43%) say they and their family are worse off financially than they were a year ago. Similar shares say they are financially in about the same spot (43% adults, 44% likely voters). The share who feel they are worse off has risen slightly amidst probable voters since May, but is similar among adults (37% adults, 36% likely voters). Fewer than two in ten Californians say they are better off than they were one year ago (17% adults, 13% likely voters). A wide partisan divide exists: most Democrats and independents say their financial state of affairs is nigh the same as a year ago, while solid majorities of Republicans say they are worse off. Regionally, almost half in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles say they are nigh the same, while half in the Cardinal Valley say they are worse off; residents elsewhere are divided between existence worse off and the aforementioned. Beyond demographic groups, pluralities say they are either financially about the same as terminal year or worse off, with the exception of African Americans (51% about the aforementioned, 33% worse off, 16% improve off) and Asian Americans (51% virtually the same, 27% worse off, 20% improve off). The shares saying they are worse off decline as educational attainment increases.

With persistent inflation and concerns about a possible recession in the time to come, an overwhelming majority of Californians believe the The states economy is in not so good (43% adults, 40% likely voters) or poor (33% adults, 36% likely voters) shape. Virtually a quarter of adults (3% first-class, twenty% adept) and likely voters (two% fantabulous, 23% good) experience positively about the national economy. Stiff majorities across partisan groups feel negatively, simply Republicans and independents are much more likely than Democrats to say the economy is in poor shape. Solid majorities across the state’s major regions as well as all demographic groups say the economy is in non and so good or poor shape. In a recent ABC News/Washington Mail service poll, 24 percent (three% excellent, 21% good) of adults nationwide felt positively most the U.s. economy, while 74 percent (36% not and so good, 38% poor) expressed negative views.

Six in 10 likely voters say they are following news about the 2022 governor’south race very (25%) or fairly (35%) closely—a share that has risen from one-half just a month ago (17% very, 33% fairly). This finding is somewhat similar to October 2018, when 68 percent said this (28% very, twoscore% closely) a month before the previous gubernatorial election. Today, majorities beyond partisan, demographic, and regional groups say they are following news about the gubernatorial election either very or fairly closely. The shares saying they are following the news very closely is highest amid residents in Republican districts (39%), Republicans (xxx%), whites (29%), and adults with incomes of $40,000 to $79,999 (29%). Older likely voters (27%) are slightly more likely than younger likely voters (21%) to say they are following the news closely.

Autonomous incumbent Gavin Newsom is ahead of Republican Brian Dahle (55% to 36%) among probable voters, while few say they would not vote, would vote for neither, or don’t know who they would vote for in the governor’s race. The share supporting the reelection of the governor was like a month ago (58% Newsom, 31% Dahle). Today, Newsom enjoys the support of most Democrats (91%), while virtually Republicans (86%) support Dahle; Newsom has an edge over Dahle among independent likely voters (47% Newsom, 37% Dahle). Across the land’s regions, two in three in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles support Newsom, as exercise nearly half in the Inland Empire and Orange/San Diego; likely voters in the Central Valley are split up. Newsom leads in all demographic groups, with the exception of men (45% Newsom, 44% Dahle) and those with a high school diploma but (46% Newsom, 49% Dahle). The share supporting Newsom grows as educational attainment increases (46% loftier school just, 56% some higher, sixty% college graduates), while it decreases with rising income (64% less than $40,000, 56% $40,000 to $79,999, 52% $80,000 or more).

A solid majority of probable voters (62%) are satisfied with their choices of candidates in the November 8 ballot, while about three in ten (32%) are non satisfied. Shares expressing satisfaction have increased somewhat from a month ago (53%) and were similar prior to the 2018 gubernatorial election (60% October 2018). Today, a solid majority of Democrats (79%) and independents (61%) say they are satisfied, compared to fewer than half of Republicans (44%). Majorities across demographic groups say they are satisfied, and notably, women (68%) are more probable than men (56%) to say this. Majorities across the country’south regions say they are satisfied with their choices of candidates in the upcoming gubernatorial election.

In the upcoming November 8 election, there will be seven state propositions for voters. Due to time constraints, our survey only asked nearly three ballot measures: Propositions 26, 27, and 30. For each, nosotros read the proposition number, ballot, and election label. Ii of the state ballot measures were likewise included in the September survey (Propositions 27 and 30), while Proposition 26 was not.

If the ballot were held today, 34 percent of likely voters would vote “aye,” 57 percent would vote “no,” and 9 percentage are unsure of how they would vote on Proposition 26—Allows In-Person Roulette, Dice, Game, Sports Wagering on Tribal Lands. This mensurate would permit in-person sports betting at racetracks and tribal casinos, requiring that racetracks and casinos offer sports betting brand certain payments to the state to support land regulatory costs. Information technology also allows roulette and dice games at tribal casinos and adds a new way to enforce certain country gambling laws. There is partisan agreement on Prop 26: fewer than four in ten Democrats, Republicans, and independents would vote “yes.” Moreover, less than a majority beyond all regions and demographic groups—with the exception of probable voters ages xviii to 44 (51% yep, 44% no)—would vote “yep.”

If the ballot were held today, 26 percent of probable voters would vote “yeah,” 67 percent would vote “no,” and 8 percent are unsure of how they would vote on Proffer 27—Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering Outside Tribal Lands. This citizens’ initiative would allow Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online and mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. Potent majorities across partisan groups would vote “no” on Prop 27. The share voting “yep” has decreased since a month ago (34% September). Today, fewer than three in 10 across partisan groups would vote “yes” on Prop 27. Moreover, fewer than 4 in ten across regions, gender, racial/indigenous, educational activity, and income groups would vote “aye.” Likely voters ages xviii to 44 (41%) are far more than likely than older probable voters ages 45 and to a higher place (19%) to say they would vote “yes.”

If the election were held today, 41 percent of probable voters would vote “yes,” 52 percent would vote “no,” and 7 percent are unsure of how they would vote on Proposition xxx—Provides Funding for Programs to Reduce Air Pollution and Forestall Wildfires past Increasing Tax on Personal Income over $2 Million. This citizens’ initiative would increase taxes on Californians earning more than than $2 one thousand thousand annually and allocate that revenue enhancement revenue to zero-emission vehicle purchase incentives, vehicle charging stations, and wildfire prevention. The share saying “yep” on Prop 30 has decreased from 55 per centum in our September survey (annotation: since September, Governor Newsom has been featured in “no on Prop thirty” commercials). Today, unlike Prop 26 and Prop 27, partisan opinions are divided on Prop 30: 61 pct of Democrats would vote “yes,” compared to far fewer Republicans (xv%) and independents (38%). Across regions, and amid men and women, support falls short of a bulk (36% men, 45% women). Fewer than one-half across racial/indigenous groups say they would vote “yes” (39% whites, 42% Latinos, 46% other racial/ethnic groups). Just over half of probable voters with incomes under $40,000 (52%) would vote “aye,” compared to fewer in higher-income groups (42% $40,000 to $79,999, 36% $80,000 or more). Nearly half of likely voters ages 18 to 44 (49%) would vote “yes,” compared to 37 percent of older likely voters.

Fewer than half of likely voters say the issue of each of these state propositions is very of import to them. Today, 21 per centum of probable voters say the result of Prop 26 is very important, 31 percent say the result of Prop 27 is very of import, and 42 per centum say the outcome of Prop 30 is very important. The shares maxim the outcomes are very important to them have remained similar to a calendar month agone for Prop 27 (29%) and Prop 30 (42%). Today, when it comes to the importance of the outcome of Prop 26, one in four or fewer across partisan groups say it is very important to them. Virtually 1 in three across partisan groups say the event of Prop 27 is very of import to them. Fewer than half across partisan groups say the outcome of Prop 30 is very important to them.

When asked how they would vote if the 2022 election for the US Business firm of Representatives were held today, 56 percent of probable voters say they would vote for or lean toward the Democratic candidate, while 39 per centum would vote for or lean toward the Republican candidate. In September, a similar share of likely voters preferred the Democratic candidate (threescore% Democrat/lean Democrat, 34% Republican/lean Republican). Today, overwhelming majorities of partisans back up their party’southward candidate, while independents are divided (50% Democrat/lean Democrat, 44% Republican/lean Republican). Democratic candidates are preferred by a 26-point margin in Democratic-held districts, while Republican candidates are preferred past a 23-point margin in Republican-held districts. In the ten competitive California districts as defined by the Cook Political Written report, the Democratic candidate is preferred by a 22-signal margin (54% to 32%).

Abortion is another prominent result in this election. When asked about the importance of abortion rights, 61 percent of likely voters say the issue is very important in determining their vote for Congress and some other 20 percentage say it is somewhat important; just 17 percent say it is non also or not at all important. Among partisans, an overwhelming majority of Democrats (78%) and 55 pct of independents say it is very important, compared to 43 percent of Republicans. Majorities across regions and all demographic groups—with the exception of men (49% very important)—say ballgame rights are very important when making their choice amid candidates for Congress.

With the controlling party in Congress hanging in the balance, 51 percent of probable voters say they are extremely or very enthusiastic about voting for Congress this year; some other 29 pct are somewhat enthusiastic while xix percent are either not also or not at all enthusiastic. In October 2018 earlier the concluding midterm election, a like 53 percent of likely voters were extremely or very enthusiastic about voting for Congress (25% extremely, 28% very, 28% somewhat, 10% non too, viii% not at all). Today, Democrats and Republicans have virtually equal levels of enthusiasm, while independents are much less likely to exist extremely or very enthusiastic. Half or more across regions are at least very enthusiastic, with the exceptions of probable voters in Los Angeles (44%) and the San Francisco Bay Surface area (43%). At to the lowest degree one-half across demographic groups are highly enthusiastic, with the exceptions of likely voters earning $40,000 to $79,999 annually (48%), women (47%), Latinos (43%), those with a loftier school diploma or less (42%), renters (42%), and eighteen- to 44-year-olds (37%).

As Californians prepare to vote in the upcoming midterm election, fewer than half of adults and likely voters are satisfied with the way democracy is working in the United States—and few are very satisfied. Satisfaction was higher in our Feb survey when 53 percent of adults and 48 percent of probable voters were satisfied with democracy in America. Today, half of Democrats and near iv in ten independents are satisfied, compared to virtually i in five Republicans. Notably, four in ten Republicans are non at all satisfied. Across regions, half of residents in the San Francisco Bay Area (52%) and the Inland Empire (fifty%) are satisfied, compared to fewer elsewhere. Across demographic groups, fewer than half are satisfied, with the exception of Latinos (56%), those with a high school degree or less (55%), and those making less than $40,000 (53%).

In addition to the lack of satisfaction with the mode democracy is working, Californians are divided about whether Americans of unlike political positions tin can still come together and work out their differences. Twoscore-ix pct are optimistic, while 46 percent are pessimistic. Optimism has been similar in more recent years, simply has decreased 7 points since nosotros outset asked this question in September 2017 (56%). In September 2020, merely before the 2020 general election, Californians were too divided (47% optimistic, 49% pessimistic).

Today, in a rare moment of bipartisan agreement, about 4 in ten Democrats, Republicans, and independents are optimistic that Americans of different political views volition be able to come together. Across regions, about one-half in Orange/San Diego, the Inland Empire, and the San Francisco Bay Area are optimistic. Across demographic groups, only the following groups have a bulk or more than who are optimistic: African Americans and Latinos (61% each), those with a loftier school diploma or less (63%), and those with household incomes nether $40,000 (61%). Notably, in 2017, half or more beyond parties, regions, and demographic groups were optimistic.

With near two weeks to go before Governor Newsom’south bid for reelection, a majority of Californians (54%) and likely voters (52%) corroborate of the way he is handling his job, while fewer disapprove (33% adults, 45% probable voters). Approval was near identical in September (52% adults, 55% likely voters) and has been 50 pct or more than since January 2020. Today, about 8 in ten Democrats—compared to well-nigh half of independents and about one in ten Republicans—approve of Governor Newsom. Half or more beyond regions approve of Newsom, except in the Primal Valley (42%). Across demographic groups, about half or more approve of how Governor Newsom is handling his job.

With all 80 land assembly positions and half of state senate seats up for election, fewer than one-half of adults (49%) and likely voters (43%) approve of the way that the California Legislature is treatment its job. Views are deeply divided along partisan lines; approval is highest in the San Francisco Bay Area and lowest in Orange/San Diego. Near half across racial/ethnic groups approve, and blessing is much higher amongst younger Californians.

Majorities of California adults (53%) and likely voters (52%) approve of the way President Biden is handling his job, while fewer disapprove (43% adults, 47% likely voters). Approval is like to September (53% adults and likely voters), and Biden’s approval rating among adults has been at fifty percent or higher since we start asked this question in Jan 2021. Today, most eight in ten Democrats approve of Biden’s job performance, compared to well-nigh four in ten independents and one in ten Republicans. Approval is higher in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles than in the Inland Empire, Orange/San Diego, and the Central Valley. About one-half or more than across demographic groups approve of President Biden, with the exception of those with some college pedagogy (44%).

Blessing of Congress remains low, with fewer than four in ten adults (37%) and probable voters (29%) approving. Approving of Congress amongst adults has been below 40 pct for all of 2022 subsequently seeing a brief run above forty percent for all of 2021. Democrats are far more likely than Republicans to approve of Congress. Fewer than half across regions and demographic groups corroborate of Congress.

US Senator Alex Padilla is on the California ballot twice this Nov—one time for the residual of Vice President Harris’southward term and once for reelection. Senator Padilla has the approval of 46 percent of adults and 48 percent of likely voters (adults: 26% disapprove, 29% don’t know; probable voters: 31% disapprove, 22% don’t know). Approval in March was at 44 pct for adults and 39 pct for likely voters. Today, Padilla’s approval rating is much higher among Democrats than independents and Republicans. Across regions, about one-half in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and the Inland Empire approve of the US senator, compared to four in ten in Orangish/San Diego and one in 3 in the Fundamental Valley. Across demographic groups, near half or more than corroborate amidst women, younger adults, African Americans, Asian Americans, and Latinos. Views are similar across instruction and income groups, with just fewer than half approving.

US Senator Dianne Feinstein—who is non on the California ballot this November—has the approval of 41 percent of adults and likely voters (adults: 42% disapprove, 17% don’t know; likely voters: 52% disapprove, 7% don’t know). Blessing in March was at 41 percent for adults and 36 percent for likely voters. Today, Feinstein’due south approval rating is far college among Democrats and independents than Republicans. Beyond regions, blessing reaches a majority only in the San Francisco Bay Area. Across demographic groups, approving reaches a majority but amongst African Americans