Paw Paw: Liquid Concealer Light Tones
Manus Paw: Liquid Concealer Light Tones
aoa studio hand paw liquid concealer! Super creamy and medium to full coverage concealer. This concealer lasts all 24-hour interval without settling into fine lines.
Uploaded past: bella.yo on
Ingredients overview
H2o,
Steareth-21,
Sorbitan Sesquioleate,
Propylene Glycol,
Isododecane,
Mineral Oil,
Dimethicone,
Cyclopentasiloxane,
Silica,
Ethylhexyl Palmitate,
Butylene Glycol,
BHT,
Methylparaben,
Propylparaben,
Iodopropynyl Butylcarbamate,
Titanium Dioxide,
Iron Oxides,Iron Oxides,Iron Oxides
Highlights
Central Ingredients
Other Ingredients
Skim through
| Ingredient name | what-it-does |
irr., com. |
ID-Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water | solvent | ||
| Steareth-21 | emulsifying, surfactant/cleansing | ||
| Sorbitan Sesquioleate | emulsifying |
0, 0-1 |
|
| Propylene Glycol | moisturizer/humectant, solvent, viscosity decision-making |
0, 0 |
|
| Isododecane | emollient, solvent | ||
| Mineral Oil | emollient, solvent |
0, 0-2 |
|
| Dimethicone | emollient |
0, one |
|
| Cyclopentasiloxane | emollient, solvent | ||
| Silica | viscosity controlling | ||
| Ethylhexyl Palmitate | emollient, perfuming |
0, 2-four |
|
| Butylene Glycol | moisturizer/humectant, solvent |
0, i |
|
| BHT | antioxidant, preservative | ||
| Methylparaben | preservative |
0, 0 |
|
| Propylparaben | preservative, perfuming |
0, 0 |
|
| Iodopropynyl Butylcarbamate | preservative | ||
| Titanium Dioxide | sunscreen, colorant | goodie | |
| Iron Oxides,Iron Oxides,Iron Oxides | colorant |
0, 0 |
AOA Studio Paw Mitt: Liquid Concealer Light Tones
Ingredients explained
Too-called:
Aqua
|
What-information technology-does:
solvent
Proficient quondam water, aka H2O. The most common skincare ingredient of all. You lot can usually find it correct in the very beginning spot of the ingredient listing, meaning it’s the biggest affair out of all the stuff that makes up the production.
Information technology’s mainly a
solvent for ingredients
that practice non like to deliquesce in oils but rather in h2o.
Once within the skin, it hydrates, but not from the outside - putting pure water on the peel (hello long baths!) is drying.
One more matter: the water used in cosmetics is purified and deionized (it means that most all of the mineral ions inside information technology is removed). Like this, the products tin can stay more stable over time.
A waxy solid cloth that helps oil and water to mix together, aka
emulsifier. It is super similar to Steareth-20 with just a niggling more ethoxylation and thus a little more water solubility. It works very well when combined with mostly oil-soluble emulsifiers such as Steareth-2 and the two together can grade exceptionally stable emulsions.
What-information technology-does:
emulsifying
|
Irritancy:
0
[more]
">
|
Comedogenicity:
0-i
[more]
">
A mainly oil loving molecule that helps water and oil to mix nicely, aka
emulsifier. In itself, it tin can create water-in-oil emulsions (when h2o droplets are dispersed in oil), only it is used mostly next to h2o-loving emulsifiers to create squeamish and shine oil-in-water creams. Information technology can also part as a
wetting and dispersing agent
helping insoluble particles such as color pigments or inorganic sunscreens (zinc/titanium dioxide) to disperse prissy and even in liquids.
Chemically speaking, this molecule is "halfway" betwixt Sorbitan Oleate and Sorbitan Trioleate, meaning that it is also an attachment of sorbitan (a dehydrated sorbitol (sugar) molecule) with the unsaturated fatty acid Oleic Acid, simply in a ratio of 2:iii hence the "Sesqui" part in the molecule's name.
- It's a helper ingredient that improves the freeze-thaw stability of products
- It's also a solvent, humectant and to some extent a penetration enhancer
- It has a bad reputation among natural cosmetics advocates merely cosmetic scientists and toxicology experts do not agree (read more than in the geeky details section)
Read all the geeky details most Propylene Glycol here >>
A clear, colorless and odorless, highly volatile (pregnant it does not absorb into the skin only evaporates from information technology) liquid that'south used as an
emollient.
It gives a overnice not-oily light skin feeland it can improve the slip of the formula without leaving a tacky remainder backside.
It's also popular in make-up products as its volatility makes mascaras and foundations last longer. If that would non be plenty, it's also an excellent solvent, and it's a regular non only on the ingredients lists of make-ups but also on makeup removers.
Likewise-called:
Paraffinum Liquidum
|
What-information technology-does:
emollient, solvent
|
Irritancy:
0
[more than]
">
|
Comedogenicity:
0-2
[more]
">
The famous or perhaps rather infamous mineral oil. The clear oily liquid that is the "cheap by-product" of refining crude oil and the ane that gets a lot of heat for its poor provenance. It is a very controversial ingredient with pros and cons and plenty of myths around it. So permit united states of america come across them:
The pros of mineral oil
Trust us, if something is used for more 100 years in cosmetic products, it has advantages. Chemically speaking,
corrective class mineral oil
is a complex mixture of highly refined saturated hydrocarbons with C15-50 chain length. It is non just a "by-product" but rather a specifically isolated part of petroleum that is
very pure and inert.
It is a
great emollient and moisturizer working mainly past occlusivity. Occlusivity is ane of the basic mechanisms of how moisturizers work and it means that mineral oil sits on pinnacle of the skin and hinders so-called trans-epidermal water loss, i.due east water evaporating out of your pare. When compared to heavy-duty establish oil, extra virgin coconut oil, the two of them were equally efficient and condom as moisturizers in treating xerosis, a skin condition connected to very dry out skin.
The other thing that mineral oil is actually good at is being
non-irritating to the peel. The chemical composition of plant oils is more circuitous with many more possible allergens or irritating components, while mineral oil is simple, pure and sensitivity to information technology is extremely rare. If you check out the archetype French pharmacy brands and their moisturizers for the most sensitive, allergy prone skin, they usually incorporate mineral oil. This is no coincidence.
The cons of mineral oil
The pros of mineral oil tin be interpreted as cons if we expect at them from another perspective. Non penetrating the peel but more often than not just sitting on top of it and not containing biologically active components, like nice fatty acids and vitamins mean that
mineral oil does not "attend" the skin in the manner plant oils do. Mineral oil does not give the skin whatsoever extra goodness, it is simply a not-irritating moisturizer working mainly by occlusivity.
The myths around mineral oil
Badmouthing mineral oil is a favorite sport of many, it is a cheap fabric and being connected to petrolatum makes information technology fairly easy to demonize.
While it is true that industrial course mineral oil contains carcinogenic components (so-called polycyclic compounds), these are completely removed from corrective and nutrient grade mineral oil and there is no scientific data showing that the pure, cosmetic grade version is carcinogenic.
What is more, in terms of the general health effects of mineral oils used in cosmetics, a 2017 written report reviewed the data on their pare penetration and concluded that "the corrective use of mineral oils and waxes does not present a run a risk to consumers due to a lack of systemic exposure."
Some other super mutual myth surrounding mineral oil is that it is comedogenic. A 2005 study titled "Is mineral oil comedogenic?" examined this very question and guess what happened? The report ended that "based on the creature and human data reported, along with the AAD recommendation, it would appear reasonable to conclude that mineral oil is noncomedogenic in humans."
Overall, we feel that the scaremongering around mineral oil is not justified. For dry out and super-sensitive skin types information technology is a neat option. Even so, if you do not like its origin or its heavy feeling or anything else about information technology, fugitive it has never been easier. Mineral oil has such a bad reputation present that cosmetic companies hardly dare to utilize it anymore.
What-it-does:
emollient
|
Irritancy:
0
[more]
">
|
Comedogenicity:
1
[more]
">
Probably thenearly mutual silicone
of all. Information technology is a polymer (created from repeating subunits) molecule and has unlike molecular weight and thus different viscosity versions from water-light to thick liquid.
As for skincare, it makes the skin
silky shine, creates a subtle gloss and forms a
protective bulwark
(aka occlusive). Also, works well to
make full in fine lines
and wrinkles and give skin a plump look (of course that is only temporary, simply still, it's nice). In that location are as well
scar treatment
gels out in that location using dimethicone as their base ingredient. It helps to soften scars and increase their elasticity.
As for hair intendance, it is a non-volatile silicone pregnant that information technology stays on the pilus rather than evaporates from it andsmoothes the hair like no other thing. Depending on your hair type, it tin can bea bit difficult to wash out
and might crusade some build-up (btw, this is not true to all silicones, only the non-volatile types).
A super normally used v unit long, cyclic structuredsilicone
that is h2o-thin and does not stay on the skin but evaporates from information technology (called volatile silicone). Similar to other silicones, it gives pare and hair a
silky, smooth feel.
Information technology's often combined with the non-volatile (i.eastward. stays on the pare) dimethicone as the ii together course a h2o-resistant, breathable protective barrier on the skin without a negative tacky feel.
A white powdery thing that'due south the major component of glass and sand. In cosmetics, it’due south ofttimes in products that are supposed to
proceed your peel matte
as it has great oil-absorbing abilities. It’due south likewise used as a helper ingredient to
thicken upwards productsor suspend insoluble particles.
A super common, medium-spreading
emollient
ester that
gives richness to the formula and a mild feel during rubout. It can exist a replacement for mineral oil and is often combined with other emollients to accomplish dissimilar sensorial properties.
Butylene glycol, or let’south just call it BG, is a multi-tasking colorless, syrupy liquid. It’due south a slap-up option for creating a nice feeling product.
BG’s main job is unremarkably to be a
solvent
for the other ingredients. Other tasks include
helping the product to absorb faster and deeper
into the peel (penetration enhancer), making the
product spread nicely
over the skin (sideslip agent), and
alluring water
(humectant) into the pare.
It’south an ingredient whose safety hasn’t been questioned so far by anyone (at least not that we know about). BG is canonical by Ecocert and is besides used enthusiastically in natural products. BTW, it’southward also a food additive.
It'due south the acronym for Butylated Hydroxy Toluene. It's a common synthetic antioxidant that'south used as a
preservative.
There is some
controversy
around BHT. Information technology'south not a new ingredient, information technology has been used both as a
food and cosmetics additive
since the 1970s. Enough of studies tried to examine if information technology's a carcinogen or not. This Truth in Crumbling article details the situation and also writes that all these studies examine BHT when taken orally.
As for cosmetics, the CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) concluded that the amount of BHT used in cosmetic products is low (commonly around 0.01-0.1%), it does not penetrate skin far plenty to be absorbed into the bloodstream and information technology is safe to utilize in cosmetics.
What-it-does:
preservative
|
Irritancy:
0
[more]
">
|
Comedogenicity:
0
[more]
">
The most mutual type of feared-by-everyone-mostly-without-scientific-reason parabens. Information technology's a cheap, constructive and well-tolerated ingredient to
make certain the cosmetic formula does not go incorrect too shortly.
Apart from the general controversy effectually parabens (we wrote about it more than hither), there is a 2006 in-vitro (made in the lab non on real people) research about methylparaben (MP) showing that
when exposed to sunlight, MP treated skin cells suffered more damage than non-MP treated skin cells. The study was not washed with real people on real skin but still - using a good sunscreen next to MP containing products is a good idea. (Well, in fact using a sunscreen is e'er a good idea. :))
A very mutual type of feared-by-everyone-mostly-without-scientific-reason parabens. It'due south a cheap, effective and well-tolerated ingredient tobrand sure the corrective formula does not get wrong too presently.
It's one of those things that help your cosmetics not to go wrong too soon, aka a
preservative. Its strong point is being effective
against yeasts and molds, and as a squeamish bonus seems to be non-comedogenic every bit well.
It is safe in concentrations of less than 0.1% just is acutely toxic when inhaled, then it'due south non the proper preservative choice for aerosol formulas like hairsprays. Used at 0.1%, Iodopropynyl Butylcarbamate has an extremely depression rate of peel-irritation when applied direct for 24 hours (around 0.1% of iv,883 participants) and later on 48 hours that effigy was 0.5%, so it counts every bit
balmy and condom
unless your skin is super-duper sensitive.
Titanium Dioxide is
i of the ii members of the elite sunscreen group chosen concrete sunscreens
(or inorganic sunscreens if you’re a scientific discipline geek and want to be precise).
Traditionally, UV-filters are categorized as either chemical or concrete. The large difference is supposed to exist that chemical agents absorb UV-calorie-free while physical agents reflect information technology like a bunch of mini umbrellas on top of the skin. While this categorization is easy and logical information technology turns out it'south non true. A recent, 2016 study shows that inorganic sunscreens work generally by absorption, just like chemical filters, and only a little fleck by reflection (they do reflect the light in the visible spectrum, but more often than not absorb in the UV spectrum).
Anyhow, information technology doesn't matter if it reflects or absorbs, Titanium Dioxide is a pretty crawly sunscreen agent for 2 main reasons: it
gives a nice broad spectrum coverage and it'south highly stable. Its protection is very practiced between 290 - 350 nm (UVB and UVA II range), and less skilful at 350-400 nm (UVA I) range. Regular sized Titanium Dioxide besides has a
great safety contour, it's non-irritating and is pretty much gratuitous from any health concerns (like estrogenic effect worries with some chemical filters).
The
disadvantage
of Titanium Dioxide is that information technology'due south
not cosmetically elegant, meaning it's a white, "unspreadable" mess. Sunscreens containingTitanium Dioxide are often hard to spread on the skin and they leave a agonizing
whitish tint. The cosmetic industry is, of course, really trying to solve this problem and the best solution so far is using
nanoparticles. The itsy-bitsy Nano-sized particles improve both spreadability and reduce the whitish tint a lot, simply unfortunately, information technology also introduces new health concerns.
The main concern with nanoparticles is that they are then tiny that they are absorbed into the skin more we want them (ideally sunscreen should remain on the surface of the skin). In one case absorbed they might form unwanted complexes with proteins and they might promote the formation of evil free radicals. But do not panic, these are concerns nether investigation. A 2009 review article about the safety of nanoparticles summarizes this, "to date, in-vivo and in-vitro studies have not demonstrated percutaneous penetration of nanosized particles in titanium dioxide and zinc oxide sunscreens". The English translation is, so far it looks like
sunscreens with nanoparticles practice stay on the surface of the skin where they should be.
All in all, Titanium Dioxide is a famous sunscreen agent and for good reason, information technology gives wide spectrum UV protection (best at UVB and UVA II), it'south highly stable, and it has a good safe profile. It'due south definitely
one of the best UV-filter agents we accept today, especially in the US where new-generation Tinosorb filters are not (yet) approved.
Besides-called:
Ci 77491/77492/77499;Iron Oxides
|
What-it-does:
colorant
|
Irritancy:
0
[more]
">
|
Comedogenicity:
0
[more]
